[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <456D6E5C.4040805@privacy.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:26:20 +0100
From: John <me@...vacy.net>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, bunk@...sta.de, jgarzik@...ox.com,
saw@....sw.com.sg
Subject: Re: Intel 82559 NIC corrupted EEPROM
Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> John wrote:
>
>> Here is some context for those who have been added to the CC list:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_frm/thread/bdc8fd08fb601c26
>>
>> As far as I understand, some consider the eepro100 driver to be
>> obsolete, and it has been considered for removal.
>>
>> What is the current status?
>>
>> Unfortunately, e100 does not work out-of-the-box on this system.
>>
>> Is there something I can do to improve the situation?
>
> Let's go ahead and print the output from e100_load_eeprom
> debug patch attached.
Loading (then unloading) e100.ko fails the first few times (i.e. the
driver claims one of the EEPROMs is corrupted). Thereafter, sometimes it
fails, other times it works. Sounds like a race, no?
$ cat load_unload
: > /var/log/kern.log
insmod e100.ko debug=16
sleep 1
cp /var/log/kern.log insmod_$I.txt
ip link > ip_link_$I.txt
sleep 2
rmmod e100
let "I=I+1"
(cf. attached compressed archive)
FAILURE:
insmod_100.txt
insmod_101.txt
insmod_102.txt
insmod_105.txt
insmod_107.txt
insmod_108.txt
insmod_110.txt
insmod_111.txt
insmod_114.txt
SUCCESS:
insmod_103.txt
insmod_104.txt
insmod_106.txt
insmod_109.txt
insmod_112.txt
insmod_113.txt
insmod_115.txt
insmod_116.txt
On an unrelated note, insmod_100.txt is truncated at the beginning, and
insmod_110.txt is truncated in the middle (!!) cf. line 14. What would
cause klogd to behave like that?
Regards.
Download attachment "TEST-e100.tar.bz2" of type "application/octet-stream" (14424 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists