[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4807377b0611291055o6e28c66ft9edeb3c8363dd49b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:55:54 -0800
From: "Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, bunk@...sta.de, jgarzik@...ox.com,
saw@....sw.com.sg
Subject: Re: Intel 82559 NIC corrupted EEPROM
On 11/29/06, John <me@...vacy.net> wrote:
> > Let's go ahead and print the output from e100_load_eeprom
> > debug patch attached.
>
> Loading (then unloading) e100.ko fails the first few times (i.e. the
> driver claims one of the EEPROMs is corrupted). Thereafter, sometimes it
> fails, other times it works. Sounds like a race, no?
yes, or something like that. I think you may have a piece of eeprom
hardware that is either "slow" or slightly out of spec. I wonder if
the hrt kernel makes udelay(4) much more like 4us than the regular
kernels.
can you try adding mdelay(100); in e100_eeprom_load before the for loop,
and then change the multiple udelay(4) to mdelay(1) in e100_eeprom_read
> On an unrelated note, insmod_100.txt is truncated at the beginning, and
> insmod_110.txt is truncated in the middle (!!) cf. line 14. What would
> cause klogd to behave like that?
usually its because whatever is printing is printing too fast or too
much at a time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists