[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061129211757.GB5267@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:17:57 -0800
From: Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastien Bouchard <sebastien.bouchard@...kontron.com>,
akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tlclk: fix platform_device_register_simple() error check
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 03:08:30PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:34:52PM -0800, Mark Gross wrote:
> > >
> > > tlclk_device = platform_device_register_simple("telco_clock",
> > > -1, NULL, 0);
> > > - if (!tlclk_device) {
> > > + if (IS_ERR(tlclk_device)) {
> > ok
> >
> > > printk(KERN_ERR "tlclk: platform_device_register failed.\n");
> > > - ret = -EBUSY;
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(tlclk_device);
> >
> > I don't know about this but I could be wrong. Please convince me.
>
> We expect platform_device_register_simple() returns proper errno as pointer
> when it fails.
What's wrong with EBUSY?
--mgross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists