| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20061201001405.GC1245@oleg>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 03:14:05 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/2] qrcu: "quick" srcu implementation
Hopefully the final version: added a comment (thanks Paul!) for the
2-nd smp_mb().
[RFC, PATCH 1/2] qrcu: "quick" srcu implementation
Very much based on ideas, corrections, and patient explanations from
Alan and Paul.
The current srcu implementation is very good for readers, lock/unlock
are extremely cheap. But for that reason it is not possible to avoid
synchronize_sched() and polling in synchronize_srcu().
Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> It works for me, but the overhead is still large. Before it would take
> 8-12 jiffies for a synchronize_srcu() to complete without there actually
> being any reader locks active, now it takes 2-3 jiffies. So it's
> definitely faster, and as suspected the loss of two of three
> synchronize_sched() cut down the overhead to a third.
'qrcu' behaves the same as srcu but optimized for writers. The fast path
for synchronize_qrcu() is mutex_lock() + atomic_read() + mutex_unlock().
The slow path is __wait_event(), no polling. However, the reader does
atomic inc/dec on lock/unlock, and the counters are not per-cpu.
Also, unlike srcu, qrcu read lock/unlock can be used in interrupt context,
and 'qrcu_struct' can be compile-time initialized.
See also (a long) discussion:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=116370857600003
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 19-rc6/include/linux/srcu.h~1_qrcu 2006-10-22 18:24:03.000000000 +0400
+++ 19-rc6/include/linux/srcu.h 2006-11-30 04:32:42.000000000 +0300
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_SRCU_H
#define _LINUX_SRCU_H
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+
struct srcu_struct_array {
int c[2];
};
@@ -50,4 +52,32 @@ void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct
void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp);
long srcu_batches_completed(struct srcu_struct *sp);
+/*
+ * fully compatible with srcu, but optimized for writers.
+ */
+
+struct qrcu_struct {
+ int completed;
+ atomic_t ctr[2];
+ wait_queue_head_t wq;
+ struct mutex mutex;
+};
+
+int init_qrcu_struct(struct qrcu_struct *qp);
+int qrcu_read_lock(struct qrcu_struct *qp);
+void qrcu_read_unlock(struct qrcu_struct *qp, int idx);
+void synchronize_qrcu(struct qrcu_struct *qp);
+
+/**
+ * cleanup_qrcu_struct - deconstruct a quick-RCU structure
+ * @qp: structure to clean up.
+ *
+ * Must invoke this after you are finished using a given qrcu_struct that
+ * was initialized via init_qrcu_struct(). We reserve the right to
+ * leak memory should you fail to do this!
+ */
+static inline void cleanup_qrcu_struct(struct qrcu_struct *qp)
+{
+}
+
#endif
--- 19-rc6/kernel/srcu.c~1_qrcu 2006-10-22 18:24:03.000000000 +0400
+++ 19-rc6/kernel/srcu.c 2006-12-01 01:54:30.000000000 +0300
@@ -256,3 +256,108 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_read_unlock);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_batches_completed);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_readers_active);
+
+/**
+ * init_qrcu_struct - initialize a quick-RCU structure.
+ * @qp: structure to initialize.
+ *
+ * Must invoke this on a given qrcu_struct before passing that qrcu_struct
+ * to any other function. Each qrcu_struct represents a separate domain
+ * of QRCU protection.
+ */
+int init_qrcu_struct(struct qrcu_struct *qp)
+{
+ qp->completed = 0;
+ atomic_set(qp->ctr + 0, 1);
+ atomic_set(qp->ctr + 1, 0);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&qp->wq);
+ mutex_init(&qp->mutex);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * qrcu_read_lock - register a new reader for an QRCU-protected structure.
+ * @qp: qrcu_struct in which to register the new reader.
+ *
+ * Counts the new reader in the appropriate element of the qrcu_struct.
+ * Returns an index that must be passed to the matching qrcu_read_unlock().
+ */
+int qrcu_read_lock(struct qrcu_struct *qp)
+{
+ for (;;) {
+ int idx = qp->completed & 0x1;
+ if (likely(atomic_inc_not_zero(qp->ctr + idx)))
+ return idx;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * qrcu_read_unlock - unregister a old reader from an QRCU-protected structure.
+ * @qp: qrcu_struct in which to unregister the old reader.
+ * @idx: return value from corresponding qrcu_read_lock().
+ *
+ * Removes the count for the old reader from the appropriate element of
+ * the qrcu_struct.
+ */
+void qrcu_read_unlock(struct qrcu_struct *qp, int idx)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(qp->ctr + idx))
+ wake_up(&qp->wq);
+}
+
+/**
+ * synchronize_qrcu - wait for prior QRCU read-side critical-section completion
+ * @qp: qrcu_struct with which to synchronize.
+ *
+ * Flip the completed counter, and wait for the old count to drain to zero.
+ * As with classic RCU, the updater must use some separate means of
+ * synchronizing concurrent updates. Can block; must be called from
+ * process context.
+ *
+ * Note that it is illegal to call synchronize_qrcu() from the corresponding
+ * QRCU read-side critical section; doing so will result in deadlock.
+ * However, it is perfectly legal to call synchronize_qrcu() on one
+ * qrcu_struct from some other qrcu_struct's read-side critical section.
+ */
+void synchronize_qrcu(struct qrcu_struct *qp)
+{
+ int idx;
+
+ /*
+ * The following memory barrier is needed to ensure that
+ * any prior data-structure manipulation is seen by other
+ * CPUs to happen before picking up the value of
+ * qp->completed.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ mutex_lock(&qp->mutex);
+
+ idx = qp->completed & 0x1;
+ if (atomic_read(qp->ctr + idx) == 1)
+ goto out;
+
+ atomic_inc(qp->ctr + (idx ^ 0x1));
+ /* Reduce the likelihood that qrcu_read_lock() will loop */
+ smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
+ qp->completed++;
+
+ atomic_dec(qp->ctr + idx);
+ __wait_event(qp->wq, !atomic_read(qp->ctr + idx));
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&qp->mutex);
+ smp_mb();
+ /*
+ * The above smp_mb() is needed in the case that we
+ * see the counter reaching zero, so that we do not
+ * need to block. In this case, we need to make
+ * sure that the CPU does not re-order any subsequent
+ * changes made by the caller to occur prior to the
+ * test, as seen by other CPUs.
+ */
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_qrcu_struct);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qrcu_read_lock);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qrcu_read_unlock);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_qrcu);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists