[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061201001901.GA11057@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 01:19:01 +0100
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
"Hack inc." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI MMConfig: Detect and support the E7520 and the 945G/GZ/P/PL
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:24:06PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Is that with just the code movement patch or your feature patch
> > added too? If the later can you test it with only code movement
> > (and compare against vanilla kernel). at least code movement
> > only should behave exactly the same as unpatched kernel.
>
> You misread. Unpatched kernel does not work. That's why I gave the
> git reference of the kernel too. Patched kernel does not work either,
> unsurprisingly (bios gives correct tables on that box).
Ok, I'm trying to debug it, and it's a pain. It's a timing issue,
mmcfg write accesses are too slow for something. The get_base_addr()
call is enough to slow things down too much, which explains why the
fundamentally simpler x86-64 code works without a hitch.
Finding out what it is too slow for, though, is an interesting
proposition. It's not entirely obvious it is actually related to the
sata accesses.
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists