lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:50:50 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] avr32: Fixup kprobes preemption handling.

While working on SH kprobes, I noticed that avr32 got the preemption
handling wrong in the no probe case. The idea is that upon entry of
kprobe_handler() preemption is disabled outright across the life of the
kprobe, only to be re-enabled in post_kprobe_handler().

However, in the event that the probe is never activated, there's never
any chance of hitting the post probe handler, which allows for the
current avr32 implementation to disable preemption indefinitely, as it's
currently missing a re-enable when no probe is activated.

Patch follows.

--

diff --git a/arch/avr32/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/avr32/kernel/kprobes.c
index ca41fc1..d0abbca 100644
--- a/arch/avr32/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/avr32/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ ss_probe:
 	return 1;
 
 no_kprobe:
+	preempt_enable_no_resched();
 	return ret;
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ