linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] avr32: Fixup kprobes preemption handling.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:53:12 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avr32: Fixup kprobes preemption handling.

On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:50:50PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> While working on SH kprobes, I noticed that avr32 got the preemption
> handling wrong in the no probe case. The idea is that upon entry of
> kprobe_handler() preemption is disabled outright across the life of the
> kprobe, only to be re-enabled in post_kprobe_handler().
> 
> However, in the event that the probe is never activated, there's never
> any chance of hitting the post probe handler, which allows for the
> current avr32 implementation to disable preemption indefinitely, as it's
> currently missing a re-enable when no probe is activated.
> 
> Patch follows.
> 
And that's of course..

Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/