[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061204152348.GA30961@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:23:48 -0500
From: Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [S390] cio: Make ccw_dev_id_is_equal() more robust.
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:56:24PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
...
> diff -urpN linux-2.6/include/asm-s390/cio.h linux-2.6-patched/include/asm-s390/cio.h
> --- linux-2.6/include/asm-s390/cio.h 2006-12-04 14:50:48.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6-patched/include/asm-s390/cio.h 2006-12-04 14:51:00.000000000 +0100
> @@ -278,7 +278,10 @@ struct ccw_dev_id {
> static inline int ccw_dev_id_is_equal(struct ccw_dev_id *dev_id1,
> struct ccw_dev_id *dev_id2)
> {
> - return !memcmp(dev_id1, dev_id2, sizeof(struct ccw_dev_id));
> + if ((dev_id1->ssid == dev_id2->ssid) &&
> + (dev_id1->devno == dev_id2->devno))
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> }
Why not just:
return ((dev_id1->ssid == ......) && (...));
?
Josef "Jeff" Sipek.
--
UNIX is user-friendly ... it's just selective about who it's friends are
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists