[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1165246218.8364.3.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:30:18 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [S390] cio: Make ccw_dev_id_is_equal() more robust.
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:23 -0500, Josef Sipek wrote:
> > diff -urpN linux-2.6/include/asm-s390/cio.h linux-2.6-patched/include/asm-s390/cio.h
> > --- linux-2.6/include/asm-s390/cio.h 2006-12-04 14:50:48.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6-patched/include/asm-s390/cio.h 2006-12-04 14:51:00.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -278,7 +278,10 @@ struct ccw_dev_id {
> > static inline int ccw_dev_id_is_equal(struct ccw_dev_id *dev_id1,
> > struct ccw_dev_id *dev_id2)
> > {
> > - return !memcmp(dev_id1, dev_id2, sizeof(struct ccw_dev_id));
> > + if ((dev_id1->ssid == dev_id2->ssid) &&
> > + (dev_id1->devno == dev_id2->devno))
> > + return 1;
> > + return 0;
> > }
>
> Why not just:
>
> return ((dev_id1->ssid == ......) && (...));
Yes, why not. It would be a little bit shorter. The compiler probably
won't care and generate the same code..
--
blue skies,
Martin.
Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists