[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612041749.kB4HnDNw008901@ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:49:12 -0600
From: "Aucoin" <Aucoin@...ston.RR.com>
To: "'Horst H. von Brand'" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>
Cc: "'Kyle Moffett'" <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
"'Tim Schmielau'" <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...l.org>, <torvalds@...l.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <clameter@....com>
Subject: RE: la la la la ... swappiness
> From: Horst H. von Brand [mailto:vonbrand@....utfsm.cl]
> That means that there isn't a need for that memory at all (and so they
In the current isolated non-production, not actually bearing a load test
case yes. But if I can't get it to not swap on an idle system I have no hope
of avoiding OOM on a loaded system.
> In any case, how do you know it is the tar data that stays around, and not
> just that the number of pages "in use" stays roughly constant?
I'm not dumping the contents of memory so I don't.
> - What you are doing, step by step
Trying to deliver a high availability, linearly scalable, clustered iSCSI
storage solution that can be upgraded with minimum downtime.
> - What are your exact requirements
OOM not to kill anything.
> - In what exact way is it missbehaving. Please tell /in detail/ how you
OOM kills important stuff.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists