linux-kernel - drop_pagecache: Possible circular locking dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061204080902.GA5725@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:09:02 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: drop_pagecache: Possible circular locking dependency

Hi Ingo,

Got the following message when doing some benchmarks.
I guess we should not hold inode_lock on calling invalidate_inode_pages().
Any ideas?

Fengguang Wu

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.19-rc6-mm2 #3
-------------------------------------------------------
rabench.sh/7467 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&journal->j_list_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8113bdbc>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0xdc/0x1c0

but task is already holding lock:
 (inode_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff810fe857>] drop_pagecache+0x67/0x120

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (inode_lock){--..}:
       [<ffffffff810b098f>] add_lock_to_list+0x8f/0xd0
       [<ffffffff810b35b9>] __lock_acquire+0xb29/0xd40
       [<ffffffff810b3863>] lock_acquire+0x93/0xc0
       [<ffffffff81072875>] _spin_lock+0x25/0x40
       [<ffffffff81014e41>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x101/0x190
       [<ffffffff8100fa00>] __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x150/0x170
       [<ffffffff810314ae>] mark_buffer_dirty+0x1e/0x30
       [<ffffffff81139798>] __journal_temp_unlink_buffer+0x1a8/0x1c0
       [<ffffffff81139a31>] __journal_unfile_buffer+0x11/0x20
       [<ffffffff81139ac7>] __journal_refile_buffer+0x87/0x120
       [<ffffffff8113cfe5>] journal_commit_transaction+0x1005/0x1300
       [<ffffffff81141285>] kjournald+0xd5/0x230
       [<ffffffff810393ea>] kthread+0xda/0x110
       [<ffffffff8106bf38>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

-> #0 (&journal->j_list_lock){--..}:
       [<ffffffff810b19e5>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x55/0xb0
       [<ffffffff810b349e>] __lock_acquire+0xa0e/0xd40
       [<ffffffff810b3863>] lock_acquire+0x93/0xc0
       [<ffffffff81072875>] _spin_lock+0x25/0x40
       [<ffffffff8113bdbc>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0xdc/0x1c0
       [<ffffffff8112af49>] ext3_releasepage+0xa9/0xd0
       [<ffffffff8102c1ba>] try_to_release_page+0x5a/0x80
       [<ffffffff8104f438>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0xa8/0x150
       [<ffffffff81066842>] invalidate_inode_pages+0x12/0x20
       [<ffffffff810fe895>] drop_pagecache+0xa5/0x120
       [<ffffffff810fe932>] drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0x22/0x80
       [<ffffffff8109dca7>] do_rw_proc+0xe7/0x150
       [<ffffffff8109dd2a>] proc_writesys+0x1a/0x20
       [<ffffffff81018344>] vfs_write+0xf4/0x1b0
       [<ffffffff81018ea0>] sys_write+0x50/0xa0
       [<ffffffff8106b11e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
       [<00002af654962422>] 0x2af654962422
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by rabench.sh/7467:
 #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#16){----}, at: [<ffffffff810fe843>] drop_pagecache+0x53/0x120
 #1:  (inode_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff810fe857>] drop_pagecache+0x67/0x120

stack backtrace:

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8107a3e3>] dump_trace+0xb3/0x460
 [<ffffffff8107a7d3>] show_trace+0x43/0x70
 [<ffffffff8107a815>] dump_stack+0x15/0x20
 [<ffffffff810b1a26>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x96/0xb0
 [<ffffffff810b349e>] __lock_acquire+0xa0e/0xd40
 [<ffffffff810b3863>] lock_acquire+0x93/0xc0
 [<ffffffff81072875>] _spin_lock+0x25/0x40
 [<ffffffff8113bdbc>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0xdc/0x1c0
 [<ffffffff8112af49>] ext3_releasepage+0xa9/0xd0
 [<ffffffff8102c1ba>] try_to_release_page+0x5a/0x80
 [<ffffffff8104f438>] invalidate_mapping_pages+0xa8/0x150
 [<ffffffff81066842>] invalidate_inode_pages+0x12/0x20
 [<ffffffff810fe895>] drop_pagecache+0xa5/0x120
 [<ffffffff810fe932>] drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0x22/0x80
 [<ffffffff8109dca7>] do_rw_proc+0xe7/0x150
 [<ffffffff8109dd2a>] proc_writesys+0x1a/0x20
 [<ffffffff81018344>] vfs_write+0xf4/0x1b0
 [<ffffffff81018ea0>] sys_write+0x50/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8106b11e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
 [<00002af654962422>]

2 locks held by rabench.sh/7467:
 #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#16){----}, at: [<ffffffff810fe843>] drop_pagecache+0x53/0x120
 #1:  (inode_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff810fe857>] drop_pagecache+0x67/0x120
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/