linux-kernel - Re: drop_pagecache: Possible circular locking dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:32:17 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drop_pagecache: Possible circular locking dependency

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:09:02 +0800
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com> wrote:

> Got the following message when doing some benchmarks.
> I guess we should not hold inode_lock on calling invalidate_inode_pages().
> Any ideas?
> 
> Fengguang Wu
> 
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 #3
> -------------------------------------------------------
> rabench.sh/7467 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (&journal->j_list_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8113bdbc>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0xdc/0x1c0
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (inode_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff810fe857>] drop_pagecache+0x67/0x120
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 

drat, I was afraid someone would notice.

It's Hard To Fix.  Removing /proc/sys/vm/drop_pagecache would in fact be 
my preferred fix.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/