linux-kernel - Re: Why is "Memory split" Kconfig option only for EMBEDDED?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165407548.5954.224.camel@titan.tbdnetworks.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:19:08 +0100
From:	Norbert Kiesel <nkiesel@...networks.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is "Memory split" Kconfig option only for EMBEDDED?

On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 12:58 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 12:42 +0100, Norbert Kiesel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I remember reading on LKML some time ago that using VMSPLIT_3G_OPT would
> > be optimal for a machine with exactly 1GB memory (like my current
> > desktop). Why is that option only prompted for after selecting EMBEDDED
> > (which I normally don't select for desktop machines
> 
> because it changes the userspace ABI and has some other caveats.... this
> is not something you should muck with lightly 
> 

Hmm, but it's also marked EXPERIMENTAL. Would that not be the
sufficient?  Assuming I don't use any external/binary drivers and a
self-compiled kernel w//o any additional patches: is there really any
downside?

</nk>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/