lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1165407170.12561.12.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:12:50 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Benoit Boissinot <bboissin@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 progression

On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:32 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:36:27 +0100
> > "Benoit Boissinot" <bboissin@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 11/24/06, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> wrote:
> >>> Is there the equivalent of 'git bisect' for the -mmX kernels?
> >>>
> >> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/bisecting-mm-trees.txt
> >>
> > 
> > Please take the time to do that.  Yours is an interesting report - I'm not
> > aware of anything in there which was expected to cause a change of this
> > mature.
> > 
> 
> There are at least two patches in 2.6.19-rc5-mm2 that make my system much more responsive for 
> interactive jobs. The one that has the majority of the effect is:
> 
> radix-tree-rcu-lockless-readside.patch
> 
> I have not been able to isolate the second patch, which has the lesser effect. All I can say is that 
> it occurred before the above patch in patches/series. This patch was tested against 2.6.19 and fixed 
> most of the problem on that version.

Curious...

This patch introduces the direct pointer optimisation for single element
radix trees and makes the radix tree safe to read in a lock-less manner
which is not used -yet-. The only difference that that should have is
that the elements are freed using rcu callback instead of directly.

/me puzzled how this has a large effect on interactivity.

Nick?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ