[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612061744.47249.ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:44:47 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PMTMR running too fast
>
> > Is there a specific reason the check was removed (I couldn't see on in
> > the archives) or was it simply overlooked? Without it I need to pass
> > clocksource=tsc to have 2.6.18 work correctly on an older K6 system with
> > an Aladdin chipset (will dig out the precise details if required). Would
> > a patch to reintroduce the check be acceptable or would some sort of
> > blacklist based solution be more acceptable?
>
> If I recall correctly, it was pulled because there was some question as
> to if it was actually needed (x86_64 didn't need it) and it slows down
> the boot time (although not by much).
>
> I'm fine just re-adding it. Although if the number of affected systems
> are small we could just blacklist it (Ian, mind sending dmidecode
> output?).
>
> Andi, your thoughts?
Doing a check at boot time is fine for me. Just I don't want the
"read pmtmr three times at runtime" code anywhere near x86-64
I don't think the boot time check needs DMI guarding
But BTW the check is not necessarily enough -- there is at least one
NF3 machine around where the PIT timer ticks at a wrong frequency.
Safer would be probably to calibrate against RTC which is afaik used
by Windows too (so it's likely to be ok)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists