[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1165392864.5499.68.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:14:23 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: PMTMR running too fast
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:34 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 07:41 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Should tsc be preferred to pit though?
>
> Depends on your system. If C2/C3 or cpufreq state changes are detected,
> we mark the tsc as unstable.
I'm not using them on purpose but I'll check it out.
> It sounds as if from your earlier email the TSC works fine, so we might
> want to look at what's making the system think its not ok. I probably
> need to add a message as to why it was disqualified. However, that's a
> separate issue from the last patch.
I'll have a play, see if I can figure it out.
> Thanks for the testing!
Thanks for the fix!
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
* Turken thinks little kids are absolutely adorable... especialyy when
they're someone elses.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists