lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:36:27 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:58:20PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > No. If you read what I said, you'll see that you can _cheaply_ use > cmpxchg in a ll/sc based implementation. Take an atomic increment > operation. > > do { > old = load_locked(addr); > } while (store_exclusive(old, old + 1, addr); [...] > Implementing ll/sc based accessor macros allows both ll/sc _and_ cmpxchg > architectures to produce optimal code. > > Implementing an cmpxchg based accessor macro allows cmpxchg architectures > to produce optimal code and ll/sc non-optimal code. And for those of us with only load-and-zero, that's simply: #define load_locked(addr) spin_lock(hash(addr)), *addr #define store_exclusive(addr, old, new) \ *addr = new, spin_unlock(hash(addr)), 0 which is also optimal for us. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists