[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061208111410.GA31068@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:14:11 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
davem@...emloft.com, wli@...omorphy.com, matthew@....cx,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] WorkStruct: Use direct assignment rather than cmpxchg()
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:58:23PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > Incorrect. pre-v6 ARM bitops for test_and_xxx_bit() all do:
> >
> > save and disable irqs
> > load value
> > test bit
> > if not in desired state, alter bit and write it back
> > restore irqs
>
> Hmmm... ARM has two implementations. One in the header files which is what I
> consulted when writing that email:
>
> static inline void ____atomic_set_bit(unsigned int bit, volatile unsigned long *p)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned long mask = 1UL << (bit & 31);
>
> p += bit >> 5;
>
> raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> *p |= mask;
> raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> And the other in the libs which does as you say. Why the one in the header
> file at all?
These are the constant versions, where the compiler can optimise the
mask and word offset itself.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists