[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4501.1165586229@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:57:09 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
torvalds@...l.org, davem@...emloft.com, wli@...omorphy.com,
matthew@....cx, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] WorkStruct: Use direct assignment rather than cmpxchg()
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> These are the constant versions, where the compiler can optimise the
> mask and word offset itself.
So my inclusion of ARM is correct... Under some circumstances it will write
to the target word when it wouldn't actually make a change:
static inline int
____atomic_test_and_set_bit(unsigned int bit, volatile unsigned long *p)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int res;
unsigned long mask = 1UL << (bit & 31);
p += bit >> 5;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
res = *p;
*p = res | mask;
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
return res & mask;
}
Remember: *p is volatile.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists