linux-kernel - Re: Mark bitrevX() functions as const

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <457D62C1.2030306@garzik.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:53:05 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
CC:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, torvalds@...l.org,
	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Mark bitrevX() functions as const

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> writes:
> 
>> * another annotation to consider is C99 keyword 'restrict'.
> 
> This is useless as long as we compile with -fno-strict-aliasing (and I
> don't think this will ever change).

Yes, just as useless as __attribute__((bitwise))... :)

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/