linux-kernel - Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0612102351280.9898@attu4.cs.washington.edu>
Date:	Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:52:20 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...washington.edu>
To:	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA
 config

On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Yasunori Goto wrote:

> No.
> Other arch's arch_add_memory() and remove_memory() have been already
> used for NUMA case too. But i386 didn't do it because just 
> contig_page_data is used. 
> Current NODE_DATA() macro is defined both case appropriately.
> So, this #ifdef is redundant now.
> 

Then I assume the comment directly above this change is also redundant 
since it explicitly states that the following code is for the non-NUMA 
case.

		David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/