[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061211093314.GC4587@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:33:15 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Andrew MChuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds orton <akpm@...l.org>" <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] pipe: Don't oops when pipe filesystem isn't mounted
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 01:25:45AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:21:30 +0000
> Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 01:13:27AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:55:57 -0800
> > > Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the bug really is the running of populate_rootfs() before running
> > > > the initcalls, in init/main.c:init(). It's just more sensible to start
> > > > running userspace after the initcalls have been run. Statically-linked
> > > > drivers which want to load firmware files will lose. To fix that we'd need
> > > > a new callback. It could be with a new linker section or perhaps simply a
> > > > notifier chain.
> > >
> > > hm, actually... Add two new initcall levels, one for populate_rootfs() and
> > > one for things which want to come after it (ie: drivers which want to
> > > access the filesytem):
> >
> > IMO we should just call pipe (and socket) initialization directly at
> > the same level as slab, task, dcache, etc.
>
> spose that would work. But what other initcall-initialised things are not
> yet available when populate_rootfs() runs?
>
> <does grep _initcall */*.c>
> <wonders why anything works at all>
Explain, please...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists