[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061213204933.GW8693@postel.suug.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:49:33 +0100
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bunk@...sta.de,
jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/loopback.c: convert to module_init()
* Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> 2006-12-13 20:12
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:17:56PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > I'm not sure whether that is important any longer. It probably isn't,
> > but we should verify it before applying such a patch.
>
> There might be practical considerations along the lines of "we want
> lookups for loopback to be fast"...
What is this discussion actually about? Since we started registering
devices directly hooked into the init process before device_initcall()
the order is random. Even the bonding device is registered before the
loopback.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists