[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061213150143.2672e0b1@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:01:43 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bunk@...sta.de,
jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/loopback.c: convert to module_init()
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:49:33 +0100
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> * Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> 2006-12-13 20:12
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:17:56PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > I'm not sure whether that is important any longer. It probably isn't,
> > > but we should verify it before applying such a patch.
> >
> > There might be practical considerations along the lines of "we want
> > lookups for loopback to be fast"...
>
> What is this discussion actually about? Since we started registering
> devices directly hooked into the init process before device_initcall()
> the order is random. Even the bonding device is registered before the
> loopback.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Loopback should be there before protocols are started. It makes sense
to have a standard startup order.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists