[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0612191116170.19395@attu4.cs.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:25:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...washington.edu>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Get rid of most of the remaining k*alloc() casts.
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> diff --git a/include/asm-um/thread_info.h b/include/asm-um/thread_info.h
> index 261e2f4..e43c2dd 100644
> --- a/include/asm-um/thread_info.h
> +++ b/include/asm-um/thread_info.h
> @@ -51,8 +51,7 @@ static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
> }
>
> /* thread information allocation */
> -#define alloc_thread_info(tsk) \
> - ((struct thread_info *) kmalloc(THREAD_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL))
> +#define alloc_thread_info(tsk) kmalloc(THREAD_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL))
> #define free_thread_info(ti) kfree(ti)
>
> #endif
This patch breaks all of usermode from the change above.
There's also no reason to avoid other cleanups in the area you're
changing (and testing) such as moving the asterisk for pointers to the
variable name, deleting extraneous whitespace, or changing the several
instances in this patch where kzalloc conversion is appropriate. If it's
not done now, it will either be forgotten or another patch on the same
elaborate scale as this one will need to fix it incrementally. Given the
high chance of typos such as the one above in broad patches like this, all
the changes should be rolled together into one patch that is at least
inspected before submission by the author.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists