linux-kernel - Re: + down_write-preserve-local-irqs.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1166612063.3365.1367.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:54:23 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: + down_write-preserve-local-irqs.patch added to -mm tree

On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 02:38 -0800, akpm@...l.org wrote:
> The patch titled
>      down_write(): preserve local irqs
> has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
>      down_write-preserve-local-irqs.patch
> 
> See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> out what to do about this
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: down_write(): preserve local irqs

excuse me? Am I missing something here?

down_write() is a sleeping function, right? what business does it have
to be *ever* called with irqs off?

if the answer is "none whatsoever", what good is saving irq state then?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/