[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061220030204.d070c807.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:02:04 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + down_write-preserve-local-irqs.patch added to -mm tree
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:54:23 +0100
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 02:38 -0800, akpm@...l.org wrote:
> > The patch titled
> > down_write(): preserve local irqs
> > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> > down_write-preserve-local-irqs.patch
> >
> > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> > out what to do about this
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > Subject: down_write(): preserve local irqs
>
> excuse me? Am I missing something here?
Lots.
> down_write() is a sleeping function, right? what business does it have
> to be *ever* called with irqs off?
>
> if the answer is "none whatsoever", what good is saving irq state then?
>
a) this patch is for testers to confirm that this fixes the hangs
b) there's plenty of precendent for this - powerpc won't boot if
mutex_lock() enables interrupts, for example. We just assume that
during early boot these sleeping locks aren't contended.
yes, it does suck.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists