| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m1ac1hng62.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:32:37 -0700 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Tomas Carnecky <tom@...ervice.com> Cc: Erik Mouw <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com>, Scott Preece <sepreece@...il.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, James Porter <jameslporter@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Binary Drivers Tomas Carnecky <tom@...ervice.com> writes: > The problem is, nobody wants to decide what to do with closed source software in > Linux. I don't care how you decide, for or against binary drivers (well, > actually I do but my opinion doesn't matter), just decide already! The decision from Linus was simple. Linus will not merge a patch that attempts to prevent this from at a technical level. No one has made any exceptions to the GPL to say that GPL incompatible drivers are allowed. Therefore on a legal level kernel drivers with GPL incompatible drivers are as illegal as the derivative works clause in copyright law will allow us to make them. If you want something firmer you can go talk to your appropriate government about taking the fuzz out of what is a derivative work. As a practical matter people not releasing source aren't playing well with us so we are not likely to play well with them. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists