[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1GxVV8-0001Jz-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:30:54 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de
CC: rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all
that again
> >
> >The root of the problem is that copy_to_user() may cause page faults
> >on the userspace buffer, and the page fault might (in case of a
> >maliciously crafted filesystem) recurse into the filesystem itself.
>
> Would it be worthwhile to mlock the page? I know that needs root
> privs or some capability, but a static buffer could be put aside when
> fusermount is run.
And how would the kernel ensure, that the buffer supplied by userspace
is mlocked and stays mlocked during the memory copy? I don't think
that would simplify the kerel side much, and would complicate the
userspace side considerably.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists