lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1GxVV8-0001Jz-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:30:54 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de
CC:	rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all
 that again

> >
> >The root of the problem is that copy_to_user() may cause page faults
> >on the userspace buffer, and the page fault might (in case of a
> >maliciously crafted filesystem) recurse into the filesystem itself.
> 
> Would it be worthwhile to mlock the page? I know that needs root
> privs or some capability, but a static buffer could be put aside when
> fusermount is run.

And how would the kernel ensure, that the buffer supplied by userspace
is mlocked and stays mlocked during the memory copy?  I don't think
that would simplify the kerel side much, and would complicate the
userspace side considerably.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ