[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061223093358.GF3960@ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:33:58 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com,
Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@...s.ku.edu>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] local_t : adding and standardising atomic primitives
Hi!
> These patches extend and standardise local_t operations on each architectures,
> allowing a rich set of atomic operations to be done on per-cpu data with
> minimal performance impact. On some architectures, there seems to be no
> difference between the SMP and UP operation (same memory barriers, same
> LOCking), local.h simply includes asm-generic/local.h, which removes duplicated
> code.
Could you provide some Documentation/? Knowing when local_t can be
used is kind-of important.
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists