linux-kernel - Re: util-linux: orphan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612281920400.5917@raven.themaw.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:28:51 +0900 (WST)
From:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
cc:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Henne Vogelsang <hvogel@...e.de>,
	Olaf Hering <olh@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: util-linux: orphan

On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Theodore Tso wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:18:24PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> >  Frankly, it wasn't always easy to use SeLinux in previous FC
> >  releases, but there is huge progress and I think it's much better in
> >  FC6.
> 
> I've never tried SELinux, but at one point there were all sorts of
> horror stories that if you enabled SELinux, the moment you installed
> any 3rd party software packages, whether it's Oracle or Websphere or
> some other commercial application program, the application would break
> because of all sorts of SELinux policy violations, and that it
> required an SELinux wizard to configure SELinux policy to enable a 3rd
> party application to actually work correctly.  Given that I tried
> enabling SELinux, witnessed things break spectacularly and with no
> hints about how to fix things, I've always had the attitude of "life
> is too short to enable SELinux", and so my limited experience is
> consistent with all of the horror stories that I've heard.

I see the fine grained security of Selinux as a big problem for third 
party applications.

It's a big job to make the OS work cleanly with it but the fact is that 
many machines need to run significant 3rd party applications. I don't have 
first hand experience but I suspect most vendors have tight enough budgets 
without adding an Selinux developer and customers usually don't have this 
resource either so, by and large, I expect people will just have to 
disable it.

I really don't see any solution to this problem either.
Time will tell.

Ian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/