linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drop page cache of a single file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061228022926.4287ca33.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:29:26 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>
Cc:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop page cache of a single file

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:19:04 +0800
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 07:49:59PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:17:25 +0800
> > "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Currently, by /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches, applications could drop pagecache,
> > > slab(dentries and inodes), or both, but applications couldn't choose to
> > > just drop the page cache of one file. An user of VOD (Video-On-Demand)
> > > needs this capability to have more detailed control on page cache release.
> > 
> > The posix_fadvise() system call should be used for this.  Probably in
> > combination with sys_sync_file_range().
> 
> Yanmin: I've been using the fadvise tool from
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ext3-tools.tar.gz
> 
> It's a nice tool:
> 
> % fadvise 
> Usage: fadvise filename offset length advice [loops]
>       advice: normal sequential willneed noreuse dontneed asyncwrite writewait
> % fadvise /var/sparse 0 0x7fffffff dontneed
> 

I was a bit reluctant to point at that because it has nasty hacks to make
it mostly-work on old glibc's which don't implement posix_fadvise().

Hopefully if you're running a recent distro, you have glibc support for
fadvise() and it's possible to write a portable version of that app which
doesn't need to know about per-arch syscall numbers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/