linux-kernel - Re: [S390] cio: fix stsch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200612310135_MC3-1-D6D0-A862@compuserve.com>
Date:	Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:31:43 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
To:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [S390] cio: fix stsch_reset.

In-Reply-To: <20061228103925.GB6270@...base>

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:39:25 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:

> @@ -881,10 +880,18 @@ static void cio_reset_pgm_check_handler(
>  static int stsch_reset(struct subchannel_id schid, volatile struct schib *addr)
>  {
>       int rc;
> +     register struct subchannel_id reg1 asm ("1") = schid;
>  
>       pgm_check_occured = 0;
>       s390_reset_pgm_handler = cio_reset_pgm_check_handler;
> -     rc = stsch(schid, addr);
> +
> +     asm volatile(
> +             "       stsch   0(%2)\n"
> +             "       ipm     %0\n"
> +             "       srl     %0,28"
> +             : "=d" (rc)
> +             : "d" (reg1), "a" (addr), "m" (*addr) : "memory", "cc");
> +
>       s390_reset_pgm_handler = NULL;
>       if (pgm_check_occured)
>               return -EIO;


Can't you just put a barrier() before the stsch() call?

-- 
MBTI: IXTP

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/