[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459752B6.1020904@ncic.ac.cn>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:03:34 +0800
From: yc_zhou <yc_zhou@...c.ac.cn>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.19] Adding branch to remove possible unnecessary inst
Function blk_queue_bounce_limit using dma flag to determine whether
assigned a certain value for member of request_queue_t. But the
assignment is unconditionally after the flag is set. It introduce
possible unnecessary instructions.
Signed-Off-By: Yingchao Zhou <yc_zhou@...c.ac.cn>
---
--- linux-2.6.19/block/ll_rw_blk.c.orig 2006-12-31 13:35:22.307742904 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.19/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2006-12-31 13:34:05.032490528 +0800
@@ -606,11 +606,13 @@ void blk_queue_bounce_limit(request_queu
know of a way to test this here. */
if (bounce_pfn < (min_t(u64,0xffffffff,BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
dma = 1;
- q->bounce_pfn = max_low_pfn;
+ else
+ q->bounce_pfn = max_low_pfn;
#else
if (bounce_pfn < blk_max_low_pfn)
dma = 1;
- q->bounce_pfn = bounce_pfn;
+ else
+ q->bounce_pfn = bounce_pfn;
#endif
if (dma) {
init_emergency_isa_pool();
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists