linux-kernel - Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] -- Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF9AB42A1E.A7654F8F-ON85257257.0061FF6C-85257257.00642493@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:05:27 -0500
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, kjhall@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] --  Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux

Being able to compile both SELinux and SLIM into the kernel was done
intentionally.  The kernel parameters 'selinux' and 'slim' can enable
or disable the LSM module at boot.  Perhaps, for the time being, the
SECURITY_SLIM_BOOTPARAM_VALUE should default to 0.

Mimi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/