linux-kernel - Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] -- Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM + selinux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1167764480.26086.113.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:01:19 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, kjhall@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should be [PATCH -mm] --  Re: [PATCH -rt] panic on SLIM +
	selinux

On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 13:05 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Being able to compile both SELinux and SLIM into the kernel was done
> intentionally.  The kernel parameters 'selinux' and 'slim' can enable
> or disable the LSM module at boot.  Perhaps, for the time being, the
> SECURITY_SLIM_BOOTPARAM_VALUE should default to 0.

They currently don't play nice together, i.e. the kernel panics with
both compiled in together and default settings. So something needs to
change..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/