[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070103124410.4cb191dd@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:44:10 +0000
From: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@...com.net>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>, s0348365@....ed.ac.uk,
torvalds@...l.org, 76306.1226@...puserve.com, akpm@...l.org,
bunk@...sta.de, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems
> > fixed. At that point an i686 kernel would contain i686 instructions and
> > actually run on all i686 processors ending all the i586 pain for most
> > users and distributions.
>
> Could you explain why CMOV is pointless now? Are there any benchmarks
> proving that?
Take a look at the recent ffmpeg bits on the mplayer list for one example
I have to hand - P4 cmov is pretty slow. The crypto folks find the same
things.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists