[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1167831136.3095.8.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:32:16 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@...com.net>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>, s0348365@....ed.ac.uk,
torvalds@...l.org, 76306.1226@...puserve.com, akpm@...l.org,
bunk@...sta.de, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 12:44 +0000, Alan wrote:
> > > fixed. At that point an i686 kernel would contain i686 instructions and
> > > actually run on all i686 processors ending all the i586 pain for most
> > > users and distributions.
> >
> > Could you explain why CMOV is pointless now? Are there any benchmarks
> > proving that?
>
> Take a look at the recent ffmpeg bits on the mplayer list for one example
> I have to hand - P4 cmov is pretty slow. The crypto folks find the same
> things.
cmov is effectively the same cost as a compare and jump, in both cases
the cpu needs to do a prediction, and on a mispredict, restart.
the reason cmov can make sense is because it's smaller code...
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists