lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:32:16 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <>
To:	Alan <>
Cc:	Grzegorz Kulewski <>,
	Mikael Pettersson <>,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems

On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 12:44 +0000, Alan wrote:
> > > fixed. At that point an i686 kernel would contain i686 instructions and
> > > actually run on all i686 processors ending all the i586 pain for most
> > > users and distributions.
> > 
> > Could you explain why CMOV is pointless now? Are there any benchmarks 
> > proving that?
> Take a look at the recent ffmpeg bits on the mplayer list for one example
> I have to hand - P4 cmov is pretty slow. The crypto folks find the same
> things.

cmov is effectively the same cost as a compare and jump, in both cases
the cpu needs to do a prediction, and on a mispredict, restart.

the reason cmov can make sense is because it's smaller code...

if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at)
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists