[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459BBF15.5070505@bull.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:35:01 +0100
From: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>,
Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
Sébastien Dugué
<sebastien.dugue@...l.net>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation
(requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)
Ingo Molnar a écrit :
>
> looks good to me in principle. The size of the patch is scary - is there
> really no simpler way?
Humf, in fact, for the 64-bit part, I've followed the rule of the existing
64-bit code in futex.c, which consists of duplicating all the functions which
can not be kept common, and add a suffix 64 to all duplicated functions.
Perhaps I missed something ?
> Also, could you send me a patch against a
> 20-rc3-rt0-ish kernel so that i can stick this into -rt for testing?
>
Ok, will do that.
Thanks,
--
Pierre Peiffer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists