linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070103155609.GB11066@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:56:10 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>,
	Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
	Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)


* Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar a écrit :
> >
> >looks good to me in principle. The size of the patch is scary - is there 
> >really no simpler way? 
> 
> Humf, in fact, for the 64-bit part, I've followed the rule of the 
> existing 64-bit code in futex.c, which consists of duplicating all the 
> functions which can not be kept common, and add a suffix 64 to all 
> duplicated functions. Perhaps I missed something ?

i dont think you missed anything - but some consolidation here would be 
nice. Only if possible of course :-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/