[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070104180223.GA11460@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:02:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/33] KVM: MMU: Cache shadow page tables
* Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we
> >have now and hold this off for 2.6.21?
> >
>
> Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them
> (and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20:
>
> - kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that
> - this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and
> a generally usable system
> - from my testing, it's quite stable
seconded - i have tested the new MMU changes quite extensively and they
are converging nicely. It brings down context-switch costs by a factor
of 10 and more, even for microbenchmarks: instead of throwing away the
full shadow pagetable hiearchy we have worked so hard to construct this
patchset allows the intelligent caching of shadow pagetables. The effect
is human-visible as well - the system got visibly snappier.
(I'd increase the shadow cache pool from the current 256 pages to at
least 1024 pages, but that's a detail.)
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists