[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459D3C65.2090703@qumranet.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:41:57 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/33] KVM: MMU: Cache shadow page tables
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we
> have now and hold this off for 2.6.21?
>
Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them
(and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20:
- kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that
- this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and
a generally usable system
- from my testing, it's quite stable
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists