linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070105115057.69d5ff11.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:50:57 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...dowen.org, hch@....de,
	manfred@...orfullife.com, christoph@...eter.com, pj@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:46:45 +0200 (EET)
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Clean up __cache_alloc and __cache_alloc_node functions a bit.  We no 
> longer need to do NUMA_BUILD tricks and the UMA allocation path is much
> simpler. No functional changes in this patch.
> 
> Note: saves few kernel text bytes on x86 NUMA build due to using gotos in
> __cache_alloc_node() and moving __GFP_THISNODE check in to fallback_alloc().

Does this actually clean things up, or does it randomly move things around
while carefully retaining existing obscurity?  Not sure..


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/