[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <courier.459EAE2D.00003EE3@courier.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:59:41 +0200
From: "Pekka J Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...dowen.org, hch@....de,
manfred@...orfullife.com, christoph@...eter.com, pj@....com
Subject: Re: slab: cache alloc cleanups
Andrew Morton writes:
> Does this actually clean things up, or does it randomly move things around
> while carefully retaining existing obscurity? Not sure..
Heh, the bulk of it is basically splitting the current __cache_alloc into
separate UMA and NUMA paths via __do_cache_alloc so we don't have to play
with NUMA_BUILD tricks. I also moved __cache_alloc_node in the same
CONFIG_NUMA block as __cache_alloc while I was at it.
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists