linux-kernel - "do_gettimeofday" vs "get_realtime_clock_ts" vs "__get_realtime_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701060542260.11402@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:46:27 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: "do_gettimeofday" vs "get_realtime_clock_ts" vs "__get_realtime_clock_ts"

  i notice, in kernel/timer.c, the kernel-doc comment for
do_gettimeofday():

  NOTE: Users should be converted to using get_realtime_clock_ts()

does this mean that do_gettimeofday() should be officially deprecated?
that *seems* to be what that note is suggesting.

  in any event, there is no "get_realtime_clock_ts" routine -- it's
actually called "__get_realtime_clock_ts".  so *something* should be
fixed here, no?

rday
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/