linux-kernel - Re: libata error handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:21:50 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
Cc:	LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: libata error handling

Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
> made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
> true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get
> extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
> errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
> perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.

Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg..

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/