| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1168109874.1512.11.camel@localhost> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:57:54 +0100 From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk> To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jgarzik@...ox.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: libata error handling On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > Kasper Sandberg wrote: > > i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what > > made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very > > true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get > > extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects > > errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i > > perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe. > > Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg.. how sure can i be of this? is it 100% sure that i have not encountered this error then? > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists