[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <459FF1F8.1050306@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:01:12 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: libata error handling
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
>>> i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
>>> made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
>>> true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get
>>> extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
>>> errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
>>> perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.
>> Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg..
> how sure can i be of this? is it 100% sure that i have not encountered
> this error then?
Pretty sure, I'm quite certain libata never does any silent error recovery..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists