[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1168261177.26086.284.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:59:37 -0800
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in remove_proc_entry()
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 13:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Well, no. Draining after the inspect 'all' loop doesn't make sense, but
> looking at 2.6.20-rc3-rt0 remove_proc_entry() looks sane.
When it was inside the loop it drained every iteration . So it made more
sense to put it after the loop. But I don't have a clue what the drain
is doing (might be good to add liberal comments, if you haven't
already).
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists