[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200701091201.21146.ak@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:01:21 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: discuss@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...re.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x86_64: re-add a newline to RESTORE_CONTEXT
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 03:55, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> RESTORE_CONTEXT lost a newline in
> commit 658fdbef66e5e9be79b457edc2cbbb3add840aa9:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00559.html
I don't think we should add such changes for external patchkits.
In general kgdb shouldn't add any patches at all. If the existing
hooks are not enough they should submit their changes needed so
that it can just work.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists